ipad - What ARM Floating Point Performance Comparison across the product line A9, A12, A15, A17, A53 etc -
i've been research relative performance of arm parts, , have found difficult come comparisons... new a12, a17 , 64 bit a53 a57s;
what i've come far, based on linpack scores of different phone/tablets this:
- a9 = 32 mflops/core/ghz
- a15 = 100 mflops/core/ghz
- apple a7 = 350 mflops /core/ghz (!)
so couple questions arise:
- where a12, a17, a53, a57 fit spectrum
- why apple's a7 floating point good? purely due 64bit internals, or else?
those linpack results via java. below linpack results via c , java. see following lots more mflops speeds.
http://www.roylongbottom.org.uk/android%20benchmarks.htm
system arm mhz android linpackv5 linpackv7 linpacksp neonlinpack linpackjava mflops mflops mflops mflops mflops t1 926ej 800 2.2 5.63 5.67 9.61 n/a 2.33 p4 v7-a8 800 2.3.5 80.18 28.34 @g t2 v7-a9 800 2.3.4 10.56 101.39 129.05 255.77 33.36 p5 v7-a9 1500 4.0.3 171.39 50.87 @g t4 v7-a9 1500a 4.0.3 16.86 155.52 204.61 382.46 56.89 t6 v7-a9 1600 4.0.3 196.47 t7 v7-a9 1300a 4.1.2 17.08 151.05 201.30 376.00 56.44 t9 926ej 800 2.2 5.66 t11 v7-a15 2000b 4.2.2 28.82 459.17 803.04 1334.90 143.06 t12 v7-a9 1600 4.1.2 147.07 t14 v7-a9 1500 4.0.4 180.95 p11 v7-a9 1400 4.0.4 19.89 184.44 235.54 454.21 56.99 p10 qu-s4 1500 4.0.3 254.90 measured mhz a=1200, b=1700 system - t = tablet, p = phone, e = emulator, @g = greencomputing, qu = qualcomm cpu
Comments
Post a Comment